Weight regain now has a timetable — and a Nature mouse study tests the limits of semaglutide enthusiasm
Read the Sunday Brief →

Study wrapper · #1263

Responders Vs. Non-Responders or How to Predict the Response to GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist Therapy.

Kuryłowicz A, Czupryniak L Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

Editor's note

A clear-eyed review that resists the pharmacogenomics hype: it notes a large GWAS linking GLP1R variation to weight-loss efficacy and GIPR variants to nausea and vomiting with tirzepatide, then flags those findings as single-cohort, self-reported and unreplicated. Narrative review, no systematic search, so read the predictor list as a research agenda rather than a hierarchy of evidence. The practical takeaway — early on-therapy response is the most defensible individualising signal — is modest and probably right.

Plain-language abstract

A narrative review of why some people respond strongly to GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/GIP drugs while others barely respond at all. Roughly one in ten trial participants with obesity loses less than 5 percent of body weight, and real-world non-response looks more common. The most useful predictor available today is simply how a person responds in the first weeks.