A phase 2 liver trial where the add-on drug didn't help — and the base drug quietly did
Read the Sunday Brief →

Study wrapper · #670

The Potential of the Peptide Drug Semax and Its Derivative for Correcting Pathological Impairments in the Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

Radchenko AI, Kuzubova EV, Apostol AA, et al. Acta naturae. 2025.
Weak / noneAnimal (in vivo)Mentions: Semax

Editor's note

In transgenic APPswe/PS1dE9 mice bred to model Alzheimer's-type amyloidosis, researchers reported that Semax and a structural derivative improved performance on open-field, novel-object-recognition and Barnes-maze tasks, and that histology showed fewer amyloid inclusions in cortex and hippocampus. This is a preclinical animal study; the design supports mechanistic and behavioral signals but not clinical conclusions. Semax is a synthetic ACTH(4-7) analogue with a long, largely Russian preclinical literature in neuroprotection, and this fits that pattern: directionally positive rodent findings without controlled human dementia trials. Weight it as an early mechanistic signal. The abstract gives no effect sizes, blinding details or adverse-event data. These are preclinical findings; human data are needed before clinical conclusions can be drawn.

Plain-language abstract

Alzheimer's disease gradually worsens memory and thinking, and no current option reliably slows it. This study tested the peptide Semax and a modified version in genetically engineered mice designed to develop Alzheimer's-like brain changes, including sticky amyloid deposits. Using standard mouse memory tests (exploring an open space, recognizing new objects, and finding their way in a maze), the researchers reported that both peptides improved the animals' cognitive performance. When they examined brain tissue, they found fewer amyloid clumps in two regions important for memory. The authors describe this as showing potential for developing strategies against Alzheimer's. Because this was done in mice, not people, the findings point to a possible mechanism rather than a demonstrated benefit in humans. The abstract does not report side effects, dosing details, or how large the improvements were.